Find out about social media age restrictions for Australians under 16. Learn more

Responses to transparency notices

Online service providers are required to report on how they are implementing the Basic Online Safety Expectations set out by the Australian Government.

The Basic Online Safety Expectations (known as 'the Expectations') are intended to help keep Australians safe while using social media, messaging and gaming services, as well as other apps and websites. 

By giving notices and information requests to online service providers, eSafety can obtain information about their compliance with the Expectations. Notices are enforceable, backed by civil penalties and other enforcement mechanisms, and can require non-periodic reporting (one-off reports) or periodic reporting (multiple reports). 

eSafety can publish summaries of the information received under notices, improving industry's transparency and driving accountability. 

This page summarises the responses to notices and information requests given to providers.

Types of reports

Under section 49(2) of the Act, eSafety can give periodic notices requiring service providers to report at regular intervals on their compliance with the Expectations. 

Under section 56(2) of the Online Safety Act 2021 (the Act), eSafety can give non-periodic notices requiring service providers to report on their compliance with the Expectations.

Under section 20 of the Online Safety (Basic Online Safety Expectations) Determination, eSafety can request certain information from a service provider by written notice and a provider is expected to comply with the request within 30 days after the notice of request is given.

Findings from transparency notices on child sexual exploitation and abuse material and activity August 2025 (periodic)

In 2024, we gave our first periodic notices on child sexual exploitation and abuse material and activity (CSEA) to eight online service providers: Apple, Discord, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Skype, Snap and WhatsApp. 

These providers are required to respond to the questions in eSafety’s notice every six months commencing 15 June 2024 for a total period of 24 months. eSafety will publish a summary of each of the providers' responses.

Download the reports

 

Findings from transparency notices on terrorist and violent extremist material and activity (including information from two providers relating to CSEA and adult sexual extortion) March 2025 (non-periodic)

This transparency report and key findings report summarise the responses Google, Meta, WhatsApp and Reddit gave to the non-periodic reporting notices, and the information Telegram provided, regarding the steps being taken to detect and address TVE on their services. Two providers, Reddit and Telegram, were also asked questions relating to child sexual exploitation and abuse (CSEA). The reports also summarise information received from Reddit and Telegram regarding the steps being taken to detect and address CSEA on their services.

Following publication of this transparency report, Google LLC provided additional information relating to its capabilities to detect known TVE images and videos. It also requested that eSafety address an omission in the transparency report and key findings document related to Google LLC’s user reporting. The following addendum sets out the additions and clarifications, which are footnoted in the original report and key findings.

Download the reports

 

Finding of non-compliance and action taken: Telegram

eSafety found that Telegram did not comply with the notice given to it on 18 March 2024. Telegram did not provide a report to the Commissioner in response to the notice by the deadline of 6 May 2024. 

Telegram did not engage with eSafety during the notice period to seek any clarification that might have enabled compliance. eSafety advised Telegram that it had failed to provide a report in response to the notice.

eSafety subsequently received information from Telegram that was required by the notice, five months after the notice deadline.

In February 2025, Telegram was given an infringement notice for AUD957,780 for failing to respond to the notice by the deadline. 

Matter before the Administrative Review Tribunal

Following receipt of the non-periodic reporting notice given to it in March 2024, X Corp. sought review in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (now the Administrative Review Tribunal) of eSafety’s decision to give X Corp. the Notice. This matter is ongoing. 

Findings on Australian children’s social media use (information request) February 2025

This transparency report summarises the responses to the information requests given on 2 September 2024 to Discord, Meta (Facebook and Instagram), Reddit, Snapchat, TikTok, Twitch and Google (YouTube) in relation to children’s social media access and the safeguards in place to assess the age of users.

This research also draws on a subset of data from eSafety’s ‘Children and Social Media’ survey. The survey explored the use of social media and messaging services by children (including teens) since the beginning of 2024. 

The survey was conducted in September 2024 with a nationally representative sample of 8 to 15-year-olds living in Australia. A total of 1,504 children participated in the survey, with most being 8 to 12-year-olds (1,049) and the rest being 13 to 15-year-olds (455). Further information about the survey is available on the Children and social media research page. 

Download the report

Findings from transparency notice on online hate January 2024 (non-periodic)

This transparency report and key findings report summarise the response to the notice given to X Corp. in relation to online hate on Twitter (subsequently rebranded as X) given on 21 June 2023. 

Download the report

 

Finding of non-compliance and action taken: X Corp.

X Corp. was required to respond by the deadline set by the Notice, including any extensions granted. eSafety also informed X Corp. that it could request an extension of time to enable it to comply with the Notice. Two extensions were granted to respond at X Corp.’s request. 
 
eSafety found that X Corp. did not comply with the Notice by providing responses that were incorrect, significantly incomplete or irrelevant. 
 
Subsequent information was provided by X Corp. after the Notice deadline that sought to rectify earlier omissions of information provided. eSafety took this into account in deciding upon the appropriate enforcement action.  

eSafety has given a service provider notification to X Corp., to confirm its non-compliance by the Notice deadline and to deter it from future non-compliance.

Findings from transparency notices on child sexual exploitation and abuse material and activity October 2023 (non-periodic)

This transparency report and key findings report summarise the responses to notices given to Google, Twitter (X), TikTok, Twitch and Discord regarding the steps being taken to detect and address child sexual exploitation and abuse on their services, including sexual extortion and the safety of recommender systems.

Read key findings

Download the reports

 

Following publication of this transparency report, X Corp. advised eSafety that its response to questions regarding the detection of livestreaming of child sexual exploitation and abuse on the Twitter service ‘was inaccurate due to an inadvertent error' and provided a revised response to the question. The following document includes X Corp.'s revised response.

Finding of non-compliance and action taken: Google

Google failed to answer a number of questions in response to the notice, in certain instances providing generic information where specific information was sought. eSafety found that Google failed to prepare a report in the manner and form required and did not comply to the extent that it was capable, as required under sections 56(2)(b) and 57 of the Act.

Google has been issued with a formal warning, notifying it of its failure to comply, and warning against non-compliance in the future.

Finding of non-compliance and action taken: X Corp. (in relation to the Twitter service) 

eSafety considered X Corp.'s failure to comply to be more serious. In some instances, X Corp. failed to provide any response to the question, such as by leaving the boxes entirely blank. In other instances, X Corp. provided a response that was otherwise incomplete and/or inaccurate. eSafety found that X Corp. failed to prepare a report in the manner and form required and did not comply to the extent that it was capable, as required under sections 56(2)(b) and 57 of the Act.

In October 2023, eSafety has issued a service provider notification to X Corp. confirming its non-compliance, as well as an infringement notice for AUD610,500.


Update: 21 December 2023

X Corp. did not pay the infringement notice. On 10 November 2023, it sought judicial review of eSafety’s reliance on the transparency notice and the giving of the service provider notification and infringement notice to X Corp.

On 21 December 2023, eSafety commenced civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court against X Corp. for allegedly failing to comply with the notice.

eSafety’s initiating court documents:

Read eSafety's media statement for more information. 

Findings from transparency notices on child sexual exploitation and abuse material and activity December 2022 (non-periodic)

Cover of BOSE transparency report Dec 22

This report summarises the responses to notices issued to Apple, Meta, WhatsApp, Microsoft, Skype, Snap and Omegle regarding the steps being taken to detect and address child sexual exploitation and abuse on their services.

Download the report