How common is the experience of online grooming-type behaviours among children in Australia?
In late 2024 and early 2025, prior to the implementation of the social media age restrictions1, eSafety surveyed 3,454 Australian children aged 10 to 17 years2 to determine the prevalence and nature of online experiences and harms, including grooming-type3 behaviours.4
In this survey, grooming-type behaviours included situations where adults or people 4 to 5 years older than the child did or said something creepy or inappropriate, asked them about their private parts, asked them to send a nude image of themselves, or sent them nude images.
Please note: Sexual grooming of a person under the age of 18 is a form of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Find out more.
Here are some of the key findings.
Children from certain groups are more likely to have experienced online grooming-type behaviours
47%
of trans and gender-diverse children had experienced grooming-type behaviours online.6
(27% had experienced this in the past 12 months.)
37%
of sexually diverse teens had experienced grooming-type behaviours online.7
(20% had experienced this in the past 12 months.)
29%
of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander children had experienced grooming-type behaviours online.
(16% had experienced this in the past 12 months.)
22%
of children with disability had experienced grooming-type behaviours online.
(12% had experienced this in the past 12 months.)
22%
of children from non-English speaking backgrounds had experienced grooming-type behaviours online.
(14% had experienced this in the past 12 months.)
Girls are more likely than boys to have experienced online grooming-type behaviours
18%
of girls had experienced grooming-type behaviours online at some point, compared with 14% of boys.
(11% of girls had experienced grooming-type behaviours online in the past 12 months, compared with 8% of boys.)
Experiences of online grooming-type behaviours increase with age
Graph shows prevalence of experiences of online grooming-type behaviours by child age.8
Prevalence of different online grooming-type behaviours
|
|
12%
had someone at least 4 to 5 years older than them or an adult do or say something creepy or inappropriate to them online (like ask personal questions, ask them to keep secrets, or act too friendly).9
(7% in the past 12 months).
8%
had someone at least 4 to 5 years older than them or an adult ask them about private parts of their body online.10
(4% in the past 12 months).
8%
had someone at least 4 to 5 years older than them or an adult ask them to send them a nude image11 of themselves online.12
(4% in the past 12 months).
|
|
5%
had someone at least 4 to 5 years older than them or an adult offer them money or gifts in exchange for a nude image13 of themselves online.14
(3% in the past 12 months).
7%
had someone at least 4 to 5 years older than them or an adult send them a nude image of themselves online.15
(4% in the past 12 months).
6%
had someone at least 4 to 5 years older than them or an adult send them a nude image of other people online.16
(4% in the past 12 months).
Most online grooming-type behaviours are perpetrated by unknown adults
61%
of children said that their most recent experience of online grooming-type behaviour17 was perpetrated by an adult.18
38% said the person responsible was at least 4-5 years older (but not an adult).
71%
said someone they didn’t know in real life19 was responsible for their most recent online grooming-type experience, most commonly someone they just happened to come across online (49%) or an online friend (13%).20
22% said someone they knew in real life was responsible, most commonly a friend (8%).
Online grooming-type experiences typically occur on social media
Children’s most recent experiences of online grooming-type behaviour most commonly occurred on social media21, including Snapchat (26%), Instagram (19%) and Facebook (13%).22
Children are typically targeted in direct messages
47%
said their most recent experience of grooming-type behaviour occurred in a message, text, email or call from one person, while 17% were targeted on an online group chat.
Online grooming-type experiences also occurred in more visible online spaces – 18% were most recently targeted on comments or posts on their own social media page while 16% were most recently targeted on comments or posts on someone else’s social media page.
Perpetrators of online grooming-type behaviours often use deceptive tactics
Graph shows deceptive tactics used by perpetrators of online grooming-type behaviours.23
Online grooming-type experiences trigger a range of negative emotions among children
77%
of children reported feeling at least one negative emotion after their most recent online grooming-type experience, most commonly that they felt shocked or confused (35%) or worried, unsafe or scared (33%).24
Some children also reported positive emotions, including pleased the person who was responsible liked them (7%) or grown-up or mature (5%).
Many children report having difficulties after online grooming-type experiences
51%
reported at least one difficulty after their most recent experience of online grooming-type behaviour, most commonly that they started feeling more worried or sad (24%).25
Helpful resources
‘Grooming’ a child under 18 to sexually abuse or exploit them is illegal – both online and offline. Any type of suspected child sexual abuse or exploitation, including sexual grooming, should be reported to the Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation (ACCCE).
Talking about online safety with children early and continuing the conversation as they mature is an important way to build their online safety skills.
eSafety’s Parents section has information for parents and carers, including information and advice about helping children stay safe online.
eSafety’s Kids and Young People sections provide useful information to help children and young people stay safe online.
Child sexual abuse online and Protecting children from sexual abuse online provides advice and links to information about protecting children from sexual abuse online.
Notes
1 Under the legislation, which came into effect on 10 December 2025, age-restricted social media platforms must take reasonable steps to prevent Australian children under 16 from creating or holding accounts.
2 Part of a nationally representative survey of 3,454 children aged 10 to 17 years living in Australia between December 2024 and February 2025.
3 ‘Grooming-type’ behaviours is used because grooming involves intent and a pattern of behaviour over time, which cannot be fully determined from the survey data. The survey captures behaviours commonly associated with online grooming. However, these indicators alone don’t confirm that grooming has taken place.
4 For more information about the methodology of the research, see the methodology report.
5 Children were given the option of skipping certain sensitive questions in the survey, including those on online grooming-type behaviours. Among the 3,454 children surveyed, 877 declined to see the questions on online grooming-type behaviours. The prevalence of online grooming-type behaviours reported here is therefore based on a subset of the overall sample (n=2,577).
6 The smaller sample size for trans and gender-diverse children should be considered when interpreting these findings (n=64).
7 ‘Sexually diverse’ includes participants who identified their sexual orientation as 'gay or lesbian’, ‘bisexual’, ‘queer’, ‘asexual’, ‘pansexual’ or that they are ‘still working it out’. Sexuality was asked only of children aged 13–17.
8 Arrows denote statistically significant differences between sub-groups.
9 Q: Still thinking about things that have happened to you online only. Has an adult or someone at least 4 or 5 years older than you ever …?
10 As above.
11 The creation or sharing of nude images of children constitutes, in most instances, child sexual exploitation material.
12 Q: Still thinking about things that have happened to you online only. Has an adult or someone at least 4 or 5 years older than you ever …?
13 The creation or sharing of nude images of children constitutes, in most instances, child sexual exploitation material.
14 Q: Still thinking about things that have happened to you online only. Has an adult or someone at least 4 or 5 years older than you ever …?
15 Q: And has an adult or someone at least 4 or 5 years older than you ever …?
16 As above.
17 A subset of children who had experienced online grooming-type behaviour (n=339) were asked further questions about their most recent or impactful experience of this.
18 Thinking about the last time <<an adult /someone who was at least 4 or 5 years older than you>> [RECENT EXPERIENCE]. Was that person an adult or at least 4 or 5 years older than you were at the time?
19 Q: Keep thinking about the last time <<an adult /someone who was at least 4 or 5 years older than you>> [RECENT EXPERIENCE]. Who did this?
20 Q: Think about the last time <<an adult /someone who was at least 4 or 5 years older than you>> who you didn’t know in real life [RECENT EXPERIENCE]. How would you describe them?
21 Q: Think just about the last time <<an adult /someone who was at least 4 or 5 years older than you>> [RECENT EXPERIENCE]. Which platform did this happen on?
22 Platforms reported by <5% of children combined as ‘Another online platform’.
23 Q: Think about the last time <<an adult /someone who was at least 4 or 5 years older than you>> [RECENT EXPERIENCE]. Did this person also do any of the things below? You can choose more than one answer.
24 Q: Keep thinking about the last time <<an adult /someone who was at least 4 or 5 years older than you>> [RECENT EXPERIENCE]. How did you feel? You can choose more than one answer.
25 Q: Keep thinking about the last time <<an adult /someone who was at least 4 or 5 years older than you>> [RECENT EXPERIENCE]. Did you have any difficulties because of this experience? You can choose more than one answer.
Last updated: 26/10/2026